Community of Christ - Promoting communities of joy, hope, love, and peace.

Powered by Google required graphic

SITE 
 SEARCH 

SITE MAP

CONTRIBUTE ONLINE
Printer
Friendly
Printer Friendly Version



 

Why Is Congregational Life
So Important for Sharing the Peace of Jesus Christ?

2007 Peace Colloquy Keynote Address
by President Steve Veazey

Audiodownloadable MP3 fileHigh-bandwidth streaming media for DSL or cable modem connections Low bandwidth streaming media for dialup connections Listen to or download audio or view video of this keynote address.


Buenos dias, to our distinguished guests.  Good morning, bonjour, jambo, hi y'all, Tennessee contingent.

Are you awake this morning? I was in a congregation once where right before the service they told me that typically, about ten minutes into a sermon, there was an individual in the congregation who would fall asleep and begin to snore loudly, and that they were going to position one of the deacons right next to him, and when he started snoring, the obligation of the deacon was to give him an elbow and wake him up. And I took that as a personal challenge—to try to keep this man awake. But sure enough, about ten minutes into my sermon, I heard the snoring begin, and I saw the deacon giving a very pastoral elbow, and there was kind of a different noise, but the snoring continued. And then he reared back and really stuck it in his ribs, and the man woke up and smiled and looked around just like he knew what was going on.  So, how many of you think the person next to you may need an usher this morning? OK—the Chattanooga group! They got caught up in the Independence nightlife last night. 

Our topic today is “Why is congregational life so important to sharing the peace of Jesus Christ?”  First, I’d like to look at a basic theological concept that has already been referred to several times this weekend. As Christians, we believe that the Word—God’s creative, restoring, action—became flesh and lived among us in the life of Jesus Christ. Through the Incarnation, God became present in the world in a particular era, in a particular culture, in a particular religious tradition, in a particular political situation. And as was so eloquently pointed out this weekend, the particularity of Jesus was as a Galilean peasant Jew who, according to his biblical genealogy, was of mixed race. While that particularity initially limited who could see and hear God’s “in the flesh” word of justice and peace, this particularity is exactly what made the Word hearable, seeable, touchable, so that a decisive revelation of God’s vision of shalom—justice, peace, wholeness for creation—could be perceived and understood better. 

The first human response, we know, was twofold. Some who had a degree of understanding of the vision formed companionship or community around the Word; those who did not, tried to exterminate the Word by killing Jesus. But remarkably, the execution of Jesus on the cross simply furthered the revelation of God’s word in the life and ministry of Jesus. And it energized in the universe the work of reconciliation and justice-making that Jesus was all about.      So, here’s a critical point for our topic this morning: following the Resurrection—which was God’s resounding yes to the message and vision of Jesus Christ—the Word was released into the world, through the power of the Holy Spirit, as a universal message of hope and peace on earth. It was released into the world so that it could become incarnate or enfleshed or embodied in other times in history, in other places in the world, in other cultures, in other generations, in other political entities, to continue its work of reconciliation, justice, and peacemaking. How does that continuing incarnation or enfleshment of the Word occur? 

Recently I was rereading the seminal work of Dietrich Bonhoeffer called The Cost of Discipleship—a classic work. In a chapter titled “Visible Community,” he presents the link between incarnation and the purpose of the local congregation. He asserts that the Word is not just a vague, disembodied truth or a spiritual principle to be reflected upon. He proclaims forthrightly—and this is one of my favorite parts—the Word takes up space on earth. The Word takes up space on earth in the present tense. It takes up space and, as Bonhoeffer put it, the space it takes up “is in the shape of the church,” and he’s meaning the local congregation, the fellowship—not the church building, not the shape of the building, but the people who are community. And so, initially, we proclaim, in response to the question, that we believe that the resurrected Christ lives in the relationships, in the gospel proclamation, in the sacraments, in the outreaching ministries of the local community of disciples. It is in congregations that God’s word of shalom—justice, wholeness, peace—time and time again is made visible, touchable, hearable, seeable, understandable, in the real world. 

I’ve read many books on Christianity and mission. I’m always intrigued by new models of ministry that are emerging in response to societal trends. However, I have not found a single work that predicts the end of congregations as the most enduring and faithful expression of the revelation of God in Jesus Christ. As Martin Marty, the Christian church historian, put it: “Something like the local assembly will remain fundamental. Congregations will take on the varied colorings of different times and cultures, but in every case they serve to perpetuate the embodiment which is essential in the whole church.”

In their work Congregational Studies, Carol, Dudley, and McKinney expand on this theme in almost poetic fashion. And I quote from their work:

It is our conviction that God’s presence to the world in the ministry and mission of Jesus is contained in and through the life and ministry of local congregations as well as other expressions of the church. Much of what the world sees and knows of the gospel and its meaning for life, much of what it sees and knows of God’s concern for the poor, the suffering, and the alienated, much of what it sees and knows of God’s concern for reconciliation and peacemaking, it sees and knows through the life and activities of congregations at the local level. 

Historically, we know that the earliest human response to the Word made flesh was the formation of community that sought to embody the vision and message of Jesus Christ for the world. After embarking on his public ministry, Jesus formed a fellowship of disciples quite varied in their vocations, religious views, temperaments, and status in society. The dynamic church described in the book of Acts and other books of the New Testament are also examples of this. Emboldened by the Holy Spirit, the early disciples incorporated even greater cultural and religious diversity as they sought to become truly Christ living as community in the world. In fact, these early followers of Jesus understood their baptism as not just a personal response to the gospel, but as making a covenant to be in sacred community with others, regardless of their background—generously sharing the life, spirit, and vision of Jesus Christ with people who had typically been previously strangers, foreigners, and perhaps even objects of derision for them. The following passage of scripture from the book of Galatians, chapter 3, is believed in terms of its original source, to have been a statement publicly affirmed by early Christians when they were baptized: “There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male or female; for all are one in Christ Jesus.” It was commitment to local community, without walls of division. 

It was in these covenant communities of disciples that people grew in their understanding of the peace of Jesus Christ and their ability, their capacity, to share it in the world. They learned it through teaching; they learned it through experience as they worshiped and shared table fellowship with others from different socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds. As they applied the ethical teachings of Jesus in their daily interactions; as they learned, in that local community of disciples, to resolve conflicts without resorting to violence; as they learned to share generously with those in need, especially the most vulnerable in the society of that day; as they learned to serve others despite one’s position in the larger society, they overcame cultural and religious prejudice through acts of love and reconciliation, and they bravely shared witness of Christ’s vision of justice and peace in circumstances of imperial oppression and in the face of persecution. This local faith community was an incubator of disciples—real disciples of Jesus—being motivated and equipped to share the real vision of Jesus Christ in the real world. These congregations became demonstrations of the way of Christ to the peaceable kingdom, in contrast to the culture of violence, oppression, and death occupying the larger society. They became—truly became—prophetic signal communities of the future that could be if the world increasingly embraced God’s peace, as revealed in Christ. 

It’s also interesting to note, for those of the Community of Christ tradition, that there were similar and parallel developments in the early Restoration movement—initial attempts to respond to the call, to seek to bring forth and establish the cause of Zion, the phrase we use to refer to the hope of the kingdom of God coming on earth as it is in heaven. Initial responses to that call included reconciling individual lives in community life; alleviating poverty by sharing equally; incorporating immigrants who were being drawn to the movement—strangers, foreigners, who were brought in to the center of the fellowship, and experiencing persecution in the larger society. 

The call today is for congregations to recapture the vision and zeal and commitment of the early Christian fellowships to this kind of justice and peace witness in the world. I heard a story once about a church building that burned down and was left smoking on Sunday morning, and the members gathered to look at this scene and they were very sad, and a member who had been inactive showed up and one of the members turned to this person and said, “We haven’t seen you in a long time.” And he said, “Well, I haven’t seen the church on fire in a long time.”  We’ve got to recapture that fire—for justice-making and peace. We are not necessarily the communities of disciples that Jesus envisioned simply because we occupy the same church space on Sunday mornings, or go through the routines of church activity.

Recently, the Community of Christ received Words of Counsel, and I want us to understand this morning that these Words of Counsel, though given to the whole worldwide church, are actually focused, directed towards the congregations of the church. This is a portion of now Doctrine and Covenants 163:

Jesus Christ, the embodiment of God’s shalom, invites all people [Veazey emphasis] to come and receive divine peace in the midst of the difficult questions and struggles of life. Follow Christ in the way that leads to God’s peace and discover the blessings of all of the dimensions of salvation. [Not just the hope of eternal life, but wholeness, justice, and peace in this world is included within the definition of all the dimensions of salvation.]

Generously share the invitation [the welcome, hospitality], ministries, and sacraments through which people can encounter the Living Christ who heals and reconciles through redemptive relationships in sacred community [that’s the local community of disciples.] The restoring of persons to healthy or righteous relationships with God, others, themselves, and the earth is at the heart of the purpose of your journey as a people of faith. 

You [congregations of the church] are called to create pathways in the world for peace in Christ to be relationally and culturally incarnate [enfleshed, embodied]. The hope of Zion is realized when the vision of Christ is embodied in communities of generosity, justice, and peacefulness.  [Verses 2–3a]

This is the call to congregations of the church today. The full vision and impact of shalom—healthy relationships with God, others, oneself, and the earth—are to be realized through “redemptive relationships” in “sacred community.” Or as Apostle Bolton recently put it, “One cannot be a solo Christian.” In spite of the overwhelming trends towards radical individualism, at least in the Western world today, our understanding of the gospel says one cannot be a solo Christian. For healthy discipleship, we need the fellowship of congregational life—here’s where we also learn to be real disciples of Jesus, sharing the real peace of Christ in the real world. We hurt; we fall out with others; we learn forgiveness and reconciliation; we learn how to pursue peace; we learn how to advocate for the worth of persons; we learn all the dimensions of Christ’s peace—the personal, the relational, the communal, the global—and then we are sent into our homes, our neighborhoods, our schools, our jobs, to share the salvation that comes from experiencing the peace of Christ. 

I want to be clear: I believe there can be many different faithful expressions of congregational life regardless of size, regardless of the age of the members, regardless of the location. It’s all about mission and alignment with Christ’s vision and priorities, whether it’s six people or 600 people who are meeting together. The point is we can do more together about sharing the peace of Christ than we can do on our own. Or, as the old African proverb puts it: “If you want to go fast, then go alone. But if you want to go far, go together.”

Did you know that the largest food bank in Florida was started by the Orlando congregation of the Community of Christ through a Tangible Love grant from the World Church? Other examples of congregational justice and peacemaking response: congregations that are supporting shelters for victims of domestic violence. Some congregations are taking the activities and displays in the Children’s Peace Pavilion here at the Headquarters Complex and they’re replicating it in their local congregational facility, and the children of the community are being drawn to those activities. Sponsoring Young Peacemakers Clubs in neighborhoods and schools; Russian-American Friendship Clubs between young people of the church; Outreach International/World Accord partnerships; Listening Circles; interpersonal peacemaking training—it’s all going on in congregational life now. Pastoral and advocacy ministries for immigrant families; congregational sponsorships of peace scholarships for young people wanting to study the principles of justice and peacemaking; congregations participating in the Save Darfur coalition to stop genocide in Sudan; congregational support for members who want to engage in a Daily Prayer for Peace wherever they are in the world—these are just a few. 

I want to stress, this morning, that I believe it’s important, given the vision and mission of the Community of Christ, that every congregation of the church, large or small, in the fifty nations where we are now located, every congregation should have a peace and justice ministry of some type if we are aligned with what our stated vision and mission is. Does that sound too difficult or ambitious? There’s a basic model for congregational response that can be used in any size congregation. It’s called, “How to start a church-based peacemaker group.”  It’s based on the “inward journey/outward journey” that we heard about yesterday—the inward journey/outward journey mission group model developed by the Church of the Saviour in Washington, D.C. The inward journey is spiritual formation—the deepening of one’s experience with the Spirit of Christ, which is a nonviolent, restoring, peacemaking spirit—it’s going deeper in that spirit. The outward journey is about sharing the peace of Christ in response to “unpeace” in any aspect of the world around us—the family, the congregation, the neighborhood, the town, the nation, the world. 

Very basic steps are included in this model. Gather a small group of members interested in deepening the peacemaking dimension of their discipleship, usually six to twelve people—no more than twelve people. Make sure the group is led by the members but has the support of church leadership. Why do we say that? Usually the pastor is so busy with so many things—members can lead and should lead these kinds of activities. Assign roles to the members based on the group’s discernment of each other’s gifts: Who’s the shepherd? Who’s the teacher? Who’s the organizer? Who’s the visionary in the group? And you find ways to draw out the giftedness of the members. Begin and end each meeting with prayer—this is a spiritual journey, the inward journey, the outward journey. Always be studying something about the inward journey or the outward journey of sharing the peace of Jesus Christ. Always be working on some action, some project, that has something to do with sharing the peace of Christ, no matter how large or how small. Connect your group to other groups that may be working on similar concerns. Take your concerns to the congregation, to the larger denomination. Write a one-paragraph covenant for the group to describe the group members’ commitment to the group and to each other. Now if that intrigues you at all, I would invite you to go to the Web site www.ecapc.org. That stands for “every church a peace church .org,” and you’ll find ample information about how to implement this model, which I think is an excellent model. 

But now let me bring the question of the importance of congregational life to peacemaking to an even sharper focus. In his article “Religious Violence and the Spirituality of Peacemaking,” Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer presents a sobering view of reality today. He asserts that the dominant religion in today’s world is actually violence. The dominant religion in today’s world is actually violence.

What does he mean? Here’s a summary of his points:

  • First, although people rarely kill each other for reasons of religious difference alone, they do frequently use God and religion to justify violence and killing when conflicts over land, oppression, discrimination, or any number of other grievances escalate between individuals, groups, or nations.
     
  • Number two, he says in the midst of nonreligious conflicts people frequently use religion to justify human violence with a subtle, or not so subtle, reference to sacred text, divine mission, or moral purpose—“I’ve prayed about it, and God has told me to do this”—bringing justification, divine justification, to it.
     
  • Third, when people cite sacred text to justify human violence, they don’t have to misinterpret the text. Unfortunately, portrayals of God as punishing and violent are dominant themes in various sacred texts. The problem of religious violence, in other words, is rooted in actual content, not misinterpretation of sacred text, he says.
     
  • Fourth, the widespread acceptance of violence as the means to address grievances or establish justice means that functionally, now, violence is the dominant religion in the world today. If religion and faith are about ultimate allegiance, then it can be said that violence is the world’s principal religion. Where do we put most of our money? What do we turn to when we feel that our security is threatened—is it faith, or is it other means? Where are the sacrifices occurring?
     
  • Fifth, and finally, apocalypticism may be the most dynamic religious force in the world today and is growing within diverse traditions. The apocalyptic worldview roots hope in the vindicating violence of God at the end of history—to say that it’s inevitable, that this is going to happen. And so some actually make decisions on that basis—if it’s inevitable, then let’s hurry it along. It’s growing rapidly among Jews, Christians, Muslims, and people of other faith traditions for this reason: bad news is good news in apocalyptic thought about the end of the world. Bad news is good news—it’s all perverted, it’s turned around in terms of the gospel message. It offers hope to some people who believe they’re going to be the winners because it promises not only will they be vindicated—whoever “they” are—but that their enemies will die. That’s the religion of violence that’s expressed in all the major faith traditions of the world. 

In addition to the increasingly dominant religion of violence, we must add the growing tendencies in our lives to give in to our discomfort and fears about cultural and human diversity. Despite what we say about God as the creator of humankind, we continue to behave in ways that reveal our still deeply entrenched racial and national biases. A religion of violence coupled with xenophobia—which is the fear of and even contempt for human beings who are culturally or socially different—is a lethal combination for humankind and creation. However, it is the reality of our time that is spawning the growing number of local, regional, and international conflicts—a religion of violence to which people are giving their allegiance. This reality hopefully does not cause paralysis in our faith communities, or despair, but an awakening.

When we began this morning, I asked you if you were awake. Now I’m asking, is your faith awake? Are your prophetic eyes open in terms of the real reality of the world today? Bottom line—we have choices to make. Will we passively or overtly serve the dominant religion of violence and ethnocentrism—the belief that, really, one’s own race and nationality is inherently superior to others—or will we serve Jesus Christ, the revelation of God’s peace for creation?  There are streams of violence, fear, racism, and nationalism competing with streams of compassion, hospitality, hope, and peacefulness in our faith tradition and in others. The Community of Christ, as an international denomination, has clearly signaled that it chooses to follow the path of peace by stressing sharing the peace of Jesus Christ as its primary emphasis—that’s our answer to the choice that is put before us. 

Recent sections of the Doctrine and Covenants, in terms of guidance to the church today, provide clear direction in this regard. This morning we are sitting in a temple that’s dedicated to the pursuit of peace and that is meant to call everyone and all of our congregations in the world to become sanctuaries of the peace of Jesus Christ. That’s the purpose of this temple. World Church leaders have indicated that our best understanding of the meaning of restoration and the cause of Zion today is to be engaged in ministries of healing of the human spirit, reconciliation, and peacemaking—pursuit of the peaceable kingdom for which Christ gave his life. Yet there is a separation between the vision of sharing the peace of Christ and what is actually happening in many of our congregations. We attend church regularly, we participate in congregational life, yet we continue to harbor attitudes, behaviors, and allegiances that serve to promote racial, gender, and economic injustices in our world. We say we worship the Prince of Peace, yet we ignore within our own lives and relationships the root causes of violence in our families, in our congregations—emotional, relational, as well as sometimes physical violence—in our neighborhoods, in our nation, and in the world. It’s in the local congregations of the church that the competing streams of violence or peace, fear or hope, individualism or community, must finally be resolved. 

I believe that through spiritual growth, life-long disciple formation, and congregational-based peacemaking ministries, we can root ourselves in a spirituality that promotes compassion, that promotes inclusive community and peacemaking. We can nurture a community spirituality with each other that stubbornly challenges any attempts to justify racism, isolation, or violence as unavoidable in the world. The recent Words of Counsel to the church speak specifically to this end:

Above all else, [above all else], strive to be faithful to Christ’s vision of the peaceable Kingdom of God on earth. [That means it supersedes other allegiances.] Courageously challenge cultural, political, and religious trends that are contrary to the reconciling and restoring purposes of God. Pursue peace. 

There are subtle, yet powerful, influences in the world, some even claiming to represent Christ, that seek to divide people and nations to accomplish their destructive aims. That which seeks to harden one human heart against another by constructing walls of fear and prejudice is not of God. Be especially alert [be awake] to these influences, lest they divide you or divert you from the mission to which you are called.  [Doctrine and Covenants 163 3b and c]

The hope of Zion ultimately rests on the viability of congregations that understand their core mission as the call to embody the peace of Christ. It rests on the viability of congregations to effectively shape and send disciples into the real world; to share the real peace of Christ, in all of its dimensions. John Courtney Murray once described the early Christian church as a conspiracy. By that, he meant the ancient believers, despite their varied backgrounds, learned to “breathe together,” drawing on the literal meaning of the root words con equals “with,” spire means “breathe.”  They learned to breathe together the Spirit of the peace of Jesus Christ and then share it, exhale it, to the world. 

It’s my hope that the congregations of the church will become an effective “conspiracy” for peace that counters the insidious religion of violence and racism that is tearing the fabric of our world to shreds. If local congregations cannot, or will not, embody a vision of just, compassionate, peaceful community that bridges human differences and promotes shalom—God’s peace—as their core mission, then we have effectively aborted the gospel for which Jesus gave his life. We have rendered the witness of the early Christian church irrelevant. Other aspects of the church can have an impact, can contribute. It’s in the local congregation that the setting must be established where the peace of Christ will either flourish and be shared or will be overcome by other influences. The future of the Community of Christ depends on our choices and our determination regarding the focus and priorities of congregational life and mission.