Native American Ministries  | |
|
Report of the Task Force on Ministry to Native American
Nations
Presented to the 2000 World Conference
To the First Presidency and the World Conference:
Abridged Report
Note: This is an abridged version of a larger report
submitted to the First Presidency. The full report is available at the World
Church Library/Archives.
Following the adoption of WCR 1260, "Ministry to Native American
Nations," the First Presidency established a task force to consider ways in
which the church could best focus its ministry efforts to Native American
Nations, and to encourage the development of relationship ministries with these
nations. T-2000 objectives have direct application to Native American
Ministries. Specifically, they are to:
-
articulate a Christ-centered theology of peace and justice
emerging from a Native American context;
-
engage Native American children, youth, and young adults in
ministries that teach Christian values, sustain self-esteem, and involve them
in the pursuit of peace and justice;
-
plant new communities of faith in places and under
circumstances that would invite, welcome, and engage Native Americans seeking
a deeper relationship with the Community of Christ; and
-
have full-time ministers engaged in Native American ministry.
As we discussed what issues were reasonable for us to consider,
we formed four subcommittees: Philosophy/Theology; Advocacy; Indigenous
Leadership; and Children, Youth, and Families. Each subcommittee worked, along
with meeting as a total group, to prepare information and recommendations.
A Philosophy of Ministry with Native American Nations
The Seven Gifts of the Grandfathers:
-
To cherish knowledge is to know wisdom.
-
To know love is to know peace.
-
To honor all Creation is to have respect.
-
Bravery is to face the foe with integrity.
-
Honesty in a situation is to be brave.
-
Humility is to know yourself as a sacred part of Creation.
-
Truth is to know all of these things.
--Excerpted from The Mishomis Book by Edward Benton-Banai
(Aniishinabe)
From an 1831 encounter with our ancestors on the Kansas Plain
just beyond the three-trail frontier town of Independence, Missouri, to sermons
heard at Nauvoo, Illinois, on the Mississippi in the 1840s; from early
twentieth-century missionary endeavors in Indian Territory and Oklahoma, to a
community experiment at Macy, Nebraska, among the Omaha--we acknowledge with
gratitude the efforts of missionaries of the Restoration to share the promise
and hope of the gospel among the Native Nations of North America. As Native
Americans claimed by Christ's love and Christ's call to discipleship in this
faith movement, we are grateful for those who have reached out to encircle and
include us. We stand with all of you in this sacred time and this sacred place
to proclaim: "We are the church, too"--we who are Navajo, Omaha, Winnebago,
Lakota, Kickapoo, Pottawatomi, Cherokee, Ojibwe, Aniishinabe, Oneida, Osage, and
Pueblo.
We believe in the enduring value of cross-cultural mission. The
revelation of God in languages and cultures, in history and tradition, in the
ways of moving and being of a people in the world enriches all of us. We
proclaim that God is revealed in every culture, that God's love is enfleshed in
every culture. We acknowledge that God in Christ seeks to refine and transform
those dimensions of every people and culture that destroys or distorts the call
to community. We believe that as individuals and nations we are all God's chosen
peoples. God accepts us, affirms us, and loves us without condition. We believe
that each person and nation longs for healing, and needs redemption and
salvation. We know that ultimately God is our Sovereign (Acts 4:24).
As part of a Christ-centered church, then, we affirm the
spiritual and cultural gifts of all peoples and honor the intrinsic value of
each tribe and nation. In a spirit of mutuality we commit ourselves to honor and
learn from the spiritual quests, the stewardship practices, the relationships
with the natural order, the expressions of human community, and the longing for
peace and justice among all peoples. We understand the message of Christ to
honor life, to celebrate difference, and to call people to turn from death
toward life in communities raised up in praise of their Creator (Romans 6:1-11;
8:2). As Christ found many opportunities for gentle healing and transforming
ministry, the church can offer ministry in new places among Native peoples,
accepting the preparations already made before us, for the seeds of the Spirit
have been planted there.
As a church that proclaims Christ and promotes peace and
justice, we call on all disciples to embrace the tragic lessons learned from the
historic experiences of Christianity with Native peoples. Before healing can
occur, we must recognize the destructive results of ethnocentricity; the
distortions and ignorance of those who, even in the name of the Prince of Peace,
appropriated land, and sought to systematically destroy the spirit, if not the
physical life of Native peoples.
Christian institutions consistently organized conversions by
taking God to Native Americans, not recognizing the Creator's presence already
with the people. Such conversions more often than not lacked mutuality of
spiritual awareness and depth; thus we have all been the losers. Far too much
judgment was passed in the name of Christian theology on Native peoples,
claiming salvation depended on the dominant society's values and perceptions
that depicted Native American cultures, religions, and spirituality as heathen,
pagan, and sinful. As European-based Christians demanded that native peoples put
away their rituals, symbols, prayers, and songs expressed to the Creator, a
heritage rooted in centuries of experience and faith was nearly destroyed.
We hear the call of Christ for repentance, there being "no
distinction" between us, but that we speak in humility of our failures to live
as brothers and sisters in Christ. Yet we have the promise of God's act of
redemption in Christ which allows us to walk together, bound together as a
community of Christ (Romans 3:22-24).
This is the hour of the "seventh generation." It is our task to
reaffirm a promise of hope to this generation: to heal and put away the hurts
and sorrows of the past, to put on a new face--to live a new life as Christ
calls us, recognizing the worth of all persons, to receive the gift of God in
Christ uniquely revealed through Native ministry. This hour of the "seventh
generation"--the hour of Jubilee, the hour of liberation--allows the church to
go as learner and as receiver--led by Native Americans, taught by Native
Americans, having new dimensions of scripture and gospel revealed through the
eyes and hearts, the traditions and languages of Native Americans--we, who have
been blessed by the Restoration message and in turn, bless the church.
Advocacy
Since the time that human beings offered thanks for the first
sunrise, sovereignty has been an integral part of indigenous people's daily
existence. With the original instructions from the Creator, we realize our
responsibilities. Those are the laws that lay the foundation of our society.
These responsibilities manifest through our ceremonies. Sovereignty is that
wafting thread securing the components that make a society. Without that
wafting thread, you cannot make a rug. Without that wafting thread, all you
have are unjoined, isolated components of a society. Sovereignty runs through
the vertical strands and secures the entire pattern. That is the fabric of
native society.1
--Ingrid Washinawatok (Menominee), 1999
As we considered ways in which the church could best focus its
ministry and encourage relational ministries while also recognizing the unique
tribal status of each Native American Nation, we determined that the role of
advocacy is to:
raise consciousness within the church toward a better
understanding of Native American peoples;
support and actively promote a mutual relational ministry
with Native Americans, recognizing and receiving the unique gifts and ministry
of the church's Native members as they participate in new and existing church
programs and the development of outreach to other Native Americans, while
recognizing the sovereign status of each nation;
confront and be agents for change in addressing prejudice
and racism within the church community as well as without, specifically, toward
Native Americans; and
affirm the worth of all persons, in this case, the
intrinsic place of Native Americans in the global community.
Steps to advocacy include these recommendations:
1. The Recognition of Sovereign Indian
Nations
The recognition of sovereign Indian nations is appropriate to
the development of the World Church, but its implications were probably not well
understood by the body at the 1998 World Conference. While we support the
process outlined herein, we also wish to state that there was general consensus
among the task force members that a literal interpretation of the mandate would
curtail many ministry opportunities.2
We recommend that such nations where the church becomes
"formally established within a nation" pursuant to WC Leadership Council
Policies and Procedures "Establishing the Church Internationally" (3/19/96),
and/or any revisions of such policy, be used with known "established areas" of
Native American ministry, such as the Dinéh
(Navajo) Nation.
"Federally recognized" means those
tribes have a direct government-to-government relationship with the U.S.
government. No decisions about their land and/or people may be made without the
consent of their tribal government.3 The Bureau of Indian Affairs in
the U.S. Department of the Interior publishes lists of federally acknowledged
tribes in the contiguous forty-eight states and in Alaska. Additional
information is available for Hawaii. Currently that database includes 329
American Indian tribes in the forty-eight states, 226 Alaska Native villages and
Native corporations, and an additional 216 Native Hawaiian organizations, for a
total of 771 in the United States.4 Similar data for Canada divides
their First Nation communities into nearly 600 groups. Of those, 134 communities
reside in the Province of Ontario alone. Also, on April 1, 1999, the Canadian
government established its third territory, Nunavut, which is populated by
mostly Inuit.5
This recognition would be in
harmony with the dictates of WCR 1260 and the U.S. government-to-government
relationship with federally recognized Native American tribes, respecting the
rights of self-government due the sovereign tribal government(s) and recognizing
that they have the independent power and authority to govern.
Where we become "formally
established," these nations would have full rights of delegate representation at
World Conference, inclusion of a flag at World Conference, and the assignment of
national ministers.
In reference to the use of flags,
an additional possibility may be to use a Native American Eagle Staff to
represent other Native American members. An Eagle Staff is presented before all
flags in a processional, must be carried by a veteran, and the staff must have
ownership. The staff is spiritual in nature, covered in fur and hung with
feathers, and would be placed in the center of the row of flags.6
Because of the sensitive nature of protocol in the use of flags, consideration
of using a staff should include more input from various Native American nations
to determine if they would feel represented by the use of an Eagle Staff. Many
Native American members do not feel they are truly represented if asked to stand
under the U.S. flag.
2. A Ministry to Native
American Nations Survey
The church, for many reasons, has never kept statistics regarding racial and/or
ethnic identity, nor does it appear that will change. The issue of race and
ethnic identification was discussed in January 1999 as it pertained to the setup
for the new Shelby database, but it was decided at that time not to include such
information. There is no formal, written policy. It is possible that "profile"
data may be inserted at a later time, either on a World Church level or locally,
but this is yet to be determined.7The purpose of the survey is to
identify both "native blood and native heart," that is, those who are Native
American members, as well as those who are non-Native American advocates/allies,
who may be involved in Native American ministries and/or wish to become
involved. The survey form is available both as hardcopy and on the church Web
page. [Note: no longer available online.] This survey serves as a first
step in a two-step process.
The second step involves the use of a standard membership card, to be filled
out only by Native American members of the church. While most of the members
will already be listed in Membership Records, the card will help identify our
Native American members through additional profile data in order to broaden the
base of ministry and identify further needs. Membership Records, coordinated by
Karla Zinn, World Church recorder, and the World Church Research Office, under
the direction of Duane Graham, have been consulted in this process and have
offered help as needed.
The rationale for a survey and membership profile data is easily justified.
The use of a survey and enrollment data makes available ways in which the church
might, through statistics, be held accountable for ministry, programs, and
funding use, and provides a means through which "invisible Saints" may be seen.
As Jim Wallis states in Who Speaks for God?: "When the voice of God
is invoked on behalf of those who have no voice, it is time to listen."8
Allowing for the "differential undercount," identified in U.S. Census records
since 1940 (which states that people of color and poor people in urban and rural
areas are missed at a much higher rate than whites), there is an estimated
combined Native American population in the United States of 2.4 million. Of
those people 1.3 million live on reservations.9 Sixty percent are
identified as under the age of twenty-five.10 Forty percent of all
Native Americans in the last U.S. census were under twenty, compared with 28
percent for the general population. Native Americans are the youngest and
fastest-growing minority in the U.S.11 What an opportunity for the
church, which promises to "engage 20,000 children, youth and young adults [and]
establish 200 new congregations...bringing to the church new life, freshness of
spirit, and ethnic and cultural diversity"!12
Native Americans are teachers, professors, poets, authors, activists,
construction workers, doctors, nurses, college presidents, administrative and
government officials, spiritual leaders, and more. Kevin Gover (Pawnee), the
assistant secretary for Indian Affairs in the U.S. Department of Interior, calls
these leaders of today noteworthy in the tradition of the great "patriot
warriors" of the past. Those were the leaders who laid down their arms and faced
many hardships and sacrifices to survive and preserve their people. "Patriot
warriors" put the needs of the tribe before their own safety and comforts. They
still do so today.13 Yet we need to consider also some other
information regarding Native Americans.
Native Americans lead the United States in some of the most discouraging
demographics:
- Native Americans have the lowest life expectancy of any population in this
hemisphere, except Haitians.
- The average age of death for a Native American male is forty-one years
old.
- A 1995 study found that 26.5 percent of deaths for Native American men
were linked to alcohol; for women, 13 percent--that was 5.6 times the overall
U.S. rate.
- Thirty-three percent live below the poverty level, compared with 13
percent for the total U.S. population.
- The teenage suicide rate for Native Americans (17.3 percent) is 70 percent
higher than the rate for the U.S. general population. One out of every two
girls on the reservation tries suicide by age sixteen, and one out of every
three boys.
- Unemployment is around 50 percent on most reservations, rising as high as
90 percent on some. The rate for the U.S. population as a whole in July 1999
was 4.2 percent.
- About one in eight Native Americans develops diabetes--twice the rate for
whites. Deaths from diabetes are three times higher for Native Americans.
- The school dropout rate is higher for Native Americans, especially those
living on reservations, compared with the total U.S. population.14
Native American communities, both on and off reservations, suffer harshly
with these negative realities. As one Native American member stated, "Well, they
drank to keep from seeing how horrible their life was." Another notes,
"defilement is rooted in bitterness--many Native Americans continue to defile
themselves because of the bitterness of the past or present." One member of the
task force explained, "Many Native Americans live in a history of the past,
which creates broken people, bitterness and grudges....Many see themselves as
victims of the past and present." Marginalized and in many ways "invisible" to
the mainstream communities, there is much that the church can offer in
proclaiming Jesus Christ and promoting communities of joy, hope, love, and
peace.15
3. The Creation of a Native American Nations Advocacy
Council
There is established protocol among Native Americans to meet in council to
direct and implement Native American issues. Therefore, the creation of a Native
American Nations Advocacy Council would support Native members when they
encounter injustice, discrimination, and conflict; and specifically be a place
and a person to contact. We recommend that such a council be established; that
it be chaired by the T2000 Native American minister, have the support of a
Web-page link, a development budget, and include liaison with the Peace and
Justice Office and Human Rights Committee, as many of their goals overlap with
the needs of Native American members.
We further recommend that the RLDS Church participate as an active member of
the "Washington Interreligious Staff Community," in Washington, D.C. This role
should reside at a World Church level. Also, our participation should include
being on the Native American Working Group (NAWG) of the Friends Committee on
National Legislation (FCNL). (See Appendix.)
We also go on record as supporting the creation and hiring of a "Race and
Ethnicity Specialist" at church headquarters. Such a person would be a valuable
asset to the church community, supporting T2000 ministers and others as the need
arises. As of this writing, a Diversity Action team has been created to explore
the issues related to diversity. In part, they will explore future staffing
recommendations of this type.
4. Education
Our educational goal is to raise the consciousness of the church toward a
better understanding of Native American peoples.
We are pleased that Native American thought and spirituality were woven
throughout the 1999 Peace Colloquy in words, actions, and music. We thank Andrew
Bolton for his hard work in bringing this about. We are grateful for the efforts
of Central Field members John Moody, Carole Barnes, and Linda McDaniel in
providing the information and support for our role in presenting the name of
Chief Jake Swamp for inclusion in the program. This element was the dream of
many. The Tree of Peace planting and the interfaith dialogue available were
significant representations of the experience and spirituality that Native
Americans have to offer the church and the world.
We also anticipate methods of advocacy to include involvement and inclusion
in all aspects of church resource production, e.g., Christian Education
curriculum, Temple School coursework, Saints Herald articles, reunion
workshops, hymnals, etc. To these endeavors we challenge all members to take
part and assist by sharing your gifts with those who are responsible for the
production of these resources. In this way we can all minister effectively to
help strengthen Native identity, encourage individual self-esteem, and assist
persons in "finding face, finding heart, finding vocation, and becoming
complete--a whole sense of being human."16
While we do not anticipate this task force will continue to function
following this report to the First Presidency and the World Conference, members
of the task force have consulted with Temple School and committed their time and
expertise to prepare a Temple School course on Native American
Issues/Ministries, with a release date set for the Indigenous Leadership
Conference in February 2001.
Additionally, we recommend to the World Church the development and promotion
of a Native American Heritage Appreciation Day in January of each year. While we
recognize the difficulties inherent in singling out an indigenous people, we
feel a Native American Heritage Appreciation Day to be vitally important in
focusing education and worship on the gifts and talents of Native Americans.
Moreover, it can be used to bring awareness of peace and justice issues and
further transformation and healing of all cultures. We suggest that Racial
Justice Day in January be expanded to Racial Awareness Month, with different
"races" acknowledged weekly in worship and education.
The philosophy of All Nations Sacred Circle is that it takes all people to
make the circle whole. Offertory taken on the Sunday set aside for Native
American Heritage Appreciation would provide needed funds for educational
programs to broaden our base in supporting Native American members through
cultural awareness, tying into such events as RLDS partnered/affiliated camps,
pow-wows, mentors, and preventive measures to youth at risk.
It is our hope that information coming out of such educational efforts will
compassionately lead the church to an intentional expression of reconciliation,
with an apology as part of the process of reconciliation. In speaking of the
development of an apology from the church, we would like to submit information
on a few others who have made such apologies:
Following a report made by the Royal Commission on Aboriginal People, which
condemned Canada's treatment of Indians and Inuit, the Canadian Government
formally apologized in January 1998 "for past actions that resulted in weakening
the identity of aboriginal peoples, suppressing their language and cultures, and
outlawing spiritual practices."17 "In 1986, the United Church of
Canada, in an official ceremony, apologized for organized religion's role in
suppressing native cultures."18 In January 1992, prompted by studying
an alternative view to the quincentenary of the "discovery" of the Americas by
Christopher Columbus, the Mennonite Central Committee Canada issued an apology
to Native people. In February of that same year, the joint Canadian-American
Mennonite Central Committee in session in Wichita, Kansas, approved a nearly
identical statement.19
The RLDS Human Rights Committee was established by World Conference action in
1984 and was subsequently charged with the responsibility of assisting church
members to actively support human rights both globally and locally. The goal of
the committee is to: "Create a sense of global community that values the
diversity of culture and experience, upholds the worth and contribution of all
persons, and recognizes that we have much to learn from each other."20
We believe that important aspects of this committee's work can assist the
church in terms of Native American ministry, especially in facing prejudice and
racism within the church. We may be uncomfortable in examining our own failings
to be truly Christian, where "...by one Spirit are we all baptized into one
body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free...for the body
is not one members, but many" (I Corinthians 12:13-14). Yet Carol Hampton
(Caddo), writing in Sojourners, states,
Those very people who would disavow their racism would obstruct American
Indian access to sacred sites, trivialize tribal traditions and cultures,
interfere with tribal and intertribal religious practices, denounce tribal
governments...and, at the same time, repudiate American Indian existence. Such
actions "isolate, separate, and exploit" American Indians.21
Today--and in the future as we study and learn--the church must
recognize its own gains made by our ancestors in land acquisitions from
multilayered treaties, encroachment, and mandatory removals forced upon Native
Americans. Such actions made it possible for the settlement of the Midwest, the
"cradle" of the Reorganization. We must acknowledge the cultural understandings
of the day, in which the church reflected--and reflects--the attitudes and
opinions of the dominant white society in the United States of America and
Canada. George Tinker (Osage) challenges us
...to consider in our own historical and theological context, namely, What is
our blindness today? With the best of intentions, and with the full support of
our best theologies and intellectual capabilities, do we continue to fall into
the same sort of traps and participate in unintended evils? [Tinker's]
presupposition is that without confronting and owning our past...we cannot hope
to overcome that past and generate a constructive, healing process, leading to a
world of genuine, mutual respect among peoples, communities and nations.22
All of us must examine our own hearts and actions and challenge ourselves to
be no less than the body, which the apostle Paul addressed. Repentance starts
with us, with our awareness. We have the opportunity to address the historical
events and understandings if we open ourselves to the giftedness of others and
opportunities for ministry today. We will need to find the "reconciliation
process" that can lead us to such an understanding, to such penitence.
Black Elk (Oglala Lakota) in 1948 made the following comment on inner peace
and healing:
The first peace, which is the most important, is that which comes within the
souls of men when they realize their relationship, their oneness, with the
universe and all its Powers, and when they realize that at the center of the
universe dwells Wakan-Tanka, and that this center is really everywhere, it is
within each of us. This is the real Peace, and the others are but reflections of
this. The second peace is that which is between two individuals, and the third
is that which is made between nations. But above all you should understand that
there can never be peace between nations until there is first known that true
peace which, as I have often said, is within the souls of men.23
Repentance starts with us...
Jim Wallis tells us that "racism" is ultimately a spiritual matter.
In fact, there is no such thing as "race" in the eyes of God--in whose image
we are all created equal. Race is rooted neither in biology nor culture. Race is
a social construct created by human beings for the purpose of justifying
oppression. The issue here is much deeper than "managing diversity" as some
corporations now define the task. Enjoying each other's music and restaurants,
handling each other's artifacts in a superficial multiculturalism won't be
enough.24
Donald W. Shriver Jr. asks a compelling question in "Bridging the Abyss of
Revenge" in Christian Century magazine: "Is there indeed such a thing as
collective guilt--and forgiveness...?25 He believes that "until
leaders, [members], and institutions do something about the [negative] past,
their present and future relations are likely to be corrupted by undercurrents
of hostility."26 Shriver identifies four major dynamics that mark the
path to spiritual health and the call to do justice. They are:
1. Forgiveness begins when victims abandon revenge and perpetrators
abandon professions of innocence. First, we must conquer in ourselves the
propensity to cry victim or innocent. Kevin Gover states, "We [Native Americans]
need to take the chip off our shoulders and have a dialogue."27 The
church as well must look honestly at its own history, at its own statements and
actions, to understand how we have been perpetrators.
Church members, along with millions of others, are today the direct
beneficiaries of many land deals forced on Native Americans. Who first inhabited
the land where the early church settled and expanded? Following the French and
Indian War and the American Revolution, the League of Six Nations (Iroquois)
fragmented into Canada and New York when New England farmers moved in.28
Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, and Oklahoma (all states with "native" names) had
effectively displaced Native Americans to small reservations by the time RLDS
settlers and farmers built temporary sod homes, tilled the land, and established
schools and congregations. A missionary paper, Zion's Ensign, asserted
the nationalistic view that "...the land of America is pointed to in prophecy as
a land of promise and referred to as a choice land."29
The church did not make meaningful distinctions among the many groups of
Native Americans. To the church they were all "Lamanites." Joseph Smith III
adhered to the "noble savage" concept of the mid-1800s. Fred M. Smith reflected
the benevolent paternalism of the Social Gospel.30 Hubert Case
likened "Indians" to children who had not matured to a proper and naturally
assumed progressive degree of civilization. Both Fred M. Smith and Case were
revered among the Native American members, primarily because they would actually
go to the people, to the reservations, and sit and talk with them, Case often
sitting cross-legged on the ground for many hours. Native members acknowledged
this as remarkable because many other ministers would not associate with the
people within their own culture. However both men, as well as others, assumed
the dominant culture's assessment of Native Americans and looked to
"assimilation" and "acculturation" as the avenue for Native success.
Hubert Case, known in the early twentieth century as the "missionary to the
Lamanites" staked his claim on land that the U.S. government had declared
"surplus," following the allotment of land in severalty (the division of tribal
properties into individual holdings). These "surplus runs" occurred from 1889 to
1905. During this process, white settlers acquired more than 60 percent of the
138 million acres formerly held by Native Americans before severalty.31
Case traveled to the western part of Oklahoma Territory, into the former
Cheyenne-Arapaho Reservation.32
In Oklahoma, Case met Richard A. Davis ("Thunderbird"), a son of the famous
Cheyenne chief Bull Bear. When Case found that Davis had attended the Carlisle
Indian Boarding School in Pennsylvania, he approved. According to this
assessment, Davis was a model of assimilation and "was a good example of what
the Indian could become with proper treatment and encouragement."33 Louise
Palfrey, an editor of the Religio Quarterly, conducted a survey on work
among Native Americans and published the results in Autumn Leaves in
1907. Her summary concluded with an archetypal negative assessment of Native
Americans' prospects for the future: "The Indian has not outgrown himself
everywhere; in other words, he is still considerable of the Indian. He has not
gotten over his refractoriness and become as if he never were an Indian....It
has been promised under gospel culture his better possibilities will take
ascendancy and he will rise..." [Italics added]34
Do we only need to repent for sins long past? Consider a group of Native
American women who decided to attend a "Women's Department" district meeting,
only to discover when they arrived that they were not expected or welcome. No
one from outside their congregation spoke to them the entire evening. Or
consider the Native American family whose request for a funeral was turned down
by a neighboring congregation because they did not want "Indian ceremonies" to
take place in the building. Lastly, consider how many good, well-meaning members
of the church cheer for their local sports teams, oblivious to the slurs that
"Indian mascot" teams represent to Native Americans. Such instances only point
to the need to further our awareness and continue to work for justice.
2. The...truth about past evil so essential to repentance...can be
recovered only in a context of...hope for reconciliation and a measure of
forgiveness.35 Can the church repent without the prospect of
forgiveness? Those who forgive must want to restore relationship. The church
must give priority to "restoring the dignity of the victims, renewing their
membership in...[church] society, and making a place for them in...history."36
Martha Minow of Harvard comments, "Tears in public will not be the last
tears, but to know one's tears are seen may grant a sense of
acknowledgement that makes grief less lonely and terrifying." Shriver notes,
"Such tears can nourish a new sense of place...."37 [Italics in the
original]
3. Forbearance, repentance, and truth-telling advance a process of
forgiveness when they produce a new empathy between former enemies. Shriver
states that in the "...propaganda of war, each side denigrates the humanity of
the other,...it is easier to kill [ignore, dismiss, etc.] people when you think
of them as subhuman." Shriver reminds us that "we are all vulnerable to
collaborating in the doing of great evil to our neighbors. The recognition of
this truth is one of the things Christianity should bring to [light]....After
deep fragmentation, the renewal of...community requires the catalyst of
empathy."38
4. Finally, collective forgiveness requires that one move from apology to
reparation. "A well-crafted apology can be a 'prelude to
reconciliation'...But if the integrity of apologies is to be sustained,
reparations should follow them....Symbolic gestures can effect healings, [and]
make more likely the consent of the victims to the idea of some new...community
with the perpetrators and their descendants."39
As a result of that reflection, we look to a time when the church will make
its own statement of reconciliation and apology to Native Americans. Let
there be covenant words from the church, not sentimental, emotional words,
or passing words. Respect and love are most needed.
Transformation 2000 will remain sentimental emotional words for Native
Americans until the church engages in a plan of action. Many Native Americans
will come to Christ when acknowledgment comes from the church that they are a
people of value.40 Until then, Christianity will continue to be
viewed as "the White Man's religion." As one Native American member told the
task force, "If you don't care about what I know, then how can you care about
me, and why should I care about what 'you have?'"
There is a promise of hope that Christ gave to Native Americans, which is
reflected in the Book of Mormon ("For he promised them that he would reserve
these things for a wise purpose in him, that he might show forth his power to
future generations"--Alma 17:49). Native Americans need to be seen as coming
into our promise as full, valued members in the church. Only a people of action,
with a commitment to time and resources, and a building of trust, will make a
difference for Native American Ministries to be truly transformed.
Indigenous Leadership
RLDS Native American ministries throughout the United States and Canada have
endured an arduous journey through the years. We express our appreciation to
those who have labored before us. Because of their sacrifices, we are at the
point today of stepping upon a larger stage, of transforming the work among
Native American members and expanding the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Our primary focus during this biennium has been the creation of a salaried
position for special attention to Native American ministry development. This
goal was accomplished with the development of the T2000 position titled "Native
American Ministries Specialist" within the Central Field. The presence and
participation of a T2000 staff member in the Central Field will greatly enhance
intentional dialogue, planning, response to the field, budgetary considerations,
and internal decision-making that will be relevant to the diverse Native
American populations, including those who are members and those we hope to
engage.
Because of the extensive geographic territory that Native American ministries
cover, we foresee the need for additional positions. We have targeted three
geographic areas in the United States and Canada as key development areas: the
Central Field, Northern and Greater Ontario, and Arizona, including both Phoenix
and the larger Dinéh (Navajo) Nation. Others include the Omaha Nation in
Nebraska, the Confederated Tribes of the Warms Springs Reservation (Wasco, Warms
Springs, and Paiute) in Oregon and the Pine Ridge Reservation (Lakota Nation) in
South Dakota. The needs are critical and the lack of Native American leadership
within the church is apparent. Immediate attention calls for recognition,
invitation, recruitment, training, deployment, and support of Native American
leaders in the church.
Feeling the need for an Indigenous Leadership Conference, we wish to express
our appreciation to the First Presidency for their response in extending their
approval for the use of the Temple for this event. Dates for this conference are
February 15-18, 2001. President McMurray has indicated he will plan on
participating.
We also wish to lift up programs already established in the church that may
be developed to include Native American participation and leadership
development. These include:
WoRLDService Corps. The mission of WoRLDService is to develop
indigenous young adult leadership in a diverse world.41 The
internship is designed to give college students eight to ten weeks of experience
in other cultures, and opportunities of ministry possibly related to the
student's area of study. There is great potential in the Phoenix, Arizona, area
and the Dinéh (Navajo) Reservation for this program, as most of the prerequisite
infrastructure is currently in place.
Outreach International Participatory Human Development (PHD) Program.
This program assists communities in assessing and meeting their own needs. There
are elements in this program that would enhance outreach in Native American
communities. Outreach International has expressed interest in implementing the
PHD program with and among Native American people.
Congregational Leaders Training. Members of the task force are
participating in a process of identifying and assisting Native American members
with leadership potential to engage in leadership training events such as the
Congregational Leaders Workshop, Temple School's Winter Field School as well as
local Temple School courses, and seminars held at the Center for Church Planting
(Atlanta, Georgia) and the Urban Ministries Center (Chicago, Illinois). We wish
to involve Native American individuals who want to participate and also lift up
the prospect for members to be not only students, but also teachers/leaders at
these types of events.
Mentoring. We feel a vital need for a mentoring program with
those individuals who currently fill congregational leadership responsibilities
in respect to reservation environments, thus increasing their effectiveness in
outreach ministry within their own communities. Early efforts are underway to
establish this program on the Dinéh (Navajo) Reservation and should continue to
receive support to ensure its success.
Children, Youth, and Families
The RLDS Church has a rich heritage of valuing children. Following the
establishment of a churchwide newspaper, The True Latter Day Saints' Herald,
the only other periodical to be established in the 1860s was a children's paper,
Zion's Hope.42 It was named after a successful St. Louis,
Missouri, Sunday school group. The name was also chosen to represent "...the
hope of that people, surnamed Zion." The paper told the children, "You are our
hope."43
This same feeling toward children is a traditional cultural family value for
Native American people. This value is sometimes expressed in terms of "looking
toward the seventh generation." Native American families are extended and
extensive. Child-rearing is considered to be an important community
responsibility, and it is shared among all family members.44
Traditional Native values are taught through ceremonies and rituals as well
as modeling and the experience of daily life. These include honoring of elders,
courage, and honesty, placing the good of "the people" above one's self,
humility, spirituality, knowledge (of self and history), etc. Storytelling,
ceremonies, drumming and dance, and the arts are all teaching methods. They are
all forms of "remembering to remember" and should not be trivialized or imitated
by others as games or play-acting.
Native Americans take a holistic view toward life. These values, beliefs, and
traditions are a source of strength and Native identity. In the past 500 years
of contact with dominant cultures, much of Native values and teaching went
"underground"; that is, the teachings were handed down secretly and through
longstanding oral traditions. Sadly, many teachings, especially languages, were
lost. Forced relocations, epidemics, encroachments, war and genocide, and
mandatory boarding schools, along with Native children being taken from their
communities and adopted out, have all exacted heavy tolls on Native American
peoples and their cultures. Much misunderstanding still exists in the dominant
white cultures of North America because they do not comprehend Native worldviews
or norms.
As church members build on their "capacity to respectfully and authentically
increase our knowledge about the reality of American Indians," we must also
"develop ways to examine or evaluate program structures and processes that make
them more responsive to the Indian community and respectful of Indian
traditions."45 Knowledge, awareness, and increased depth of
understanding will detract from the romanticized mysticism of the past and
reflect a commitment to building mutual respect for our spiritual and cultural
identity, grounded in the gifts of the Spirit. When respectfully sharing our
testimonies of love and healing we can invite and be invited into communities
where God's hand is at work. We recognize that there are many opportunities to
add to, rather than be in conflict with, the spiritual livelihood of a community
in ways where our movement is welcomed and appreciated.
Transformation 2000 has made a strong commitment to children, youth, and
young adults "in ministries which teach Christian values and Restoration
principles, sustain high self-esteem, and involve them in the pursuit of peace
and justice through acts of community responsibility."
Perhaps the first question that comes to mind is: Are Christian values and
Native American values compatible? The answer is affirmative! We share a strong
testimony of the Christ and how the Holy Spirit has empowered our lives. What
church members need to be careful of is that they do not confuse "Christian
values" with that of lifestyle characteristics. Simon Peter wrote that as we
exemplify faith, virtue, patience, kindness, and charity, that "if these things
be in you, and abound, [we shall not be] unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord
Jesus Christ" (II Peter 1:5-8).
"Spirituality is the core of everything Indian."46 Yet we need to
understand a difference in Native American spirituality and mainstream white
Christian-based religion. Because of the history of religious persecution, the
dominant society made a conscious political effort to separate church and
state--that is, to separate religion from other spheres of life. No longer would
religious affiliation come with the dominant government or leader. However, for
Native Americans, spirituality is embodied in all of creation. There is
sacredness in everything simply because God (Great Spirit, Grandfather, Great
Mystery, etc.) made it.
Now, in the dawning of this new era, "Indian values are being 'rediscovered,'
and implemented in restorative justice, leadership, alternative dispute
resolution and community development programs."47 (Consider how the
concept of Mother Earth and the stewardship and caring for our planet has
developed over the last thirty years.)
One activity the church has done well in the past is in providing camping
experiences for Native American youth. We "camp" very well, and have offered
significant camps in the Central Field, Minnesota, and northern Ontario. In the
summer of 1999, the camping experience was shared with the mainstream youth camp
at Lake Doniphan, thereby bringing in Native youth and Native elders who
participated as leaders in the youth camp. There is much interest and desire to
expand this type of positive experience to more Native youth.
Another "success story" that can be repeated in other areas is the "Native
American Appreciation Day." One such day was founded in Sedalia, Missouri, by
Carole Barnes and Sherry Hunsberger, and was held for several years with
assistance by members of Central Missouri Stake. F. Scottie Wilcox in Maine
requested help in duplicating the event, and the Missouri group traveled to
Maine to help set it up. It is now a major annual event in northern New England,
drawing hundreds of visitors and participants over a span of three days.
Additionally, RLDS co-sponsored or funded powwows can be a positive way to
interact with children, youth, and families, and should be developed with Native
American leadership.
There is still a great sense of loss and a subsequent need for reconciliation
and healing in many Native communities. For us as a church to engage in
reconciliatory ceremonies would be beneficial not only to a people at their
point of need, but also for the church, to listen and learn, and admit our part
in the history and the healings that need to take place. The following action
steps are also recommended for implementation:
1. That arrangement be made to share the "Gospel Wagon" to known areas of
Native American members. Contact should begin with the tribal elders and/or
community leaders/elders so that no sense of competition or undermining their
leadership is perceived. That follow-up with these visits include developing a
Young Peacemakers Club (YPC) with Native members offering leadership respectful
of that nation's traditions. Persistence is the key; long-term commitments and
life-long relationships need to be developed.
2. That Graceland College look into a student exchange program for Winter
Term with Haskell Indian Nations University (Lawrence, Kansas), considering such
options as nursing, American Indian Studies, literature, music and the arts,
etc.
3. That the WoRLDService program not only send service teams onto
reservations in the United States or Canada where they have obtained
invitations, but also add Native American youth to the teams that are sent
elsewhere.
4. That the World Church Leadership Council continue its support and uphold a
mandate that resources produced by the World Church continue to seek avenues of
inclusive expression and not be targeted or written by or for the dominant white
culture within the church. That this mandate be extended as a call to all
members to assist whenever possible in the preparation of resources, such as
Christian education curriculum, worship helps, hymnody, Temple School, the
Congregational Leaders Workshop, Theology Colloquy, etc. The field needs many
workers for the church to be truly transformed.
5. That the World Church continue to support and develop camping
opportunities to include Native youth, and Native elders in leadership
positions, and that the church explore ways to participate in Native American
Appreciation Days, powwows, and other events.
6. That the International Youth Forum (IYF) and Spectacular (SPEC) recruit
and use Native American youth and Native American adult leaders/staff.
Conclusion
The expression of Native American ministries is alive and faces toward a
horizon we had not dreamed of. The efforts of those who have worked before us
are noteworthy, and they stand in the tradition of the great "patriot warriors"
of the past. Now, we "lift up [our] eyes and fix them on the place beyond the
horizon..." to take this vision and expand our outreach. Now, we aspire to
greater heights and a greater commitment to the vision that has been handed into
our keeping, that our future generations may take hold and build their own
vision upon ours.
Ministry to Native American Nations Task Force
David Brock, chair (Indigenous Leadership)
Dan Cash (Indigenous Leadership)
Rilla and Ed Fields (Philosophy/Theology)
Clint Jacks (Indigenous Leadership)
J. Paul Lucero (Advocacy)
Linda McDaniel (Children, Youth, and Families)
Roger McKinney (Philosophy/Theology)
Duane Nicholas (Indigenous Leadership)
Joy Persall Palmer (Philosophy/Theology)
Isleta L. Pement, secretary (Advocacy)
Marie Pepin (Children, Youth, and Families)
Lynn L. Ragan (Philosophy/Theology)
Andrea Randazzo (Advocacy)
Susan Rasmusson (Children, Youth, and Families)
Keith Russell (Children, Youth, and Families)
Dee White Eye (Advocacy)
Special thanks to Andrew Shields, Council of Twelve Office
Notes
1. Ingrid Washinawatok was one of three
humanitarian workers killed in March 1999 by Colombian rebels opposed to peace
talks between the rebels and Colombian authorities.
2. Ministry to Native American Nations Task
Force Minutes (October 10-11, 1998), 2.
3. As stated in the Constitution of the
United States of America, Article One, Section 8; Article Three, Section 2;
Article Fourteen, Section 2. The U.S. Congress extended American citizenship in
1924 to all native Americans born in the territorial limits of the United
States. Native Americans are also members of their respective tribes and thus
have dual citizenship. See BIA ANswers to FAQs:
http://www.doi.gov/bia/aitoday/q_a.html .
4. Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Indian Affairs, "Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible to Receive Service from
the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs,"
http://www.doi/gov/bia/tribes/telist98.html . This information may be broken
down alphabetically. Current tribal contacts are also available. See "Native
American Consultation Database: A Cooperative Project,"
http://www.cr.nps.gov/aad/nacd .
Each tribal record includes the name, address, and telephone number of the
official tribal contact(s).
5. Paul Frederic William Rutherford,
"Canada," The Funk & Wagnall's Multimedia Encyclopedia Online
http://www.funkandwagnalls.com
(July 1999) and "Chiefs of Ontario,"
http://www.chiefs-of-ontario.org . "Nunavut is Inuktitut, meaning "our
land."
6. Indian Country Today, "1999 Pow Wow
Special Edition" (March 22-29, 1999): 39.
7. The racial categories set by the U.S.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) which oversees the collection of
statistics by federal agencies are: American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian,
Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and White.
The census asks a separate question on whether respondents are Hispanic or
Latino. People who identify themselves as American Indian will be asked to write
in the tribe in which they are enrolled or their principal tribe. For the first
time, respondents may also check off more than one race. "The Census and
American Indians: Why Accuracy Is Important" (February 1999), National Congress
of American Indians,
http://www.ncia.org/indianissues/census/indctycensus_1999.htm
8. Jim Wallis, Who Speaks for God? An
Alternative to the Religious Right: A New Politics of Compassion, Community, and
Civility (New York: Dell, 1996), 7.
9. "The Census and American Indians," and
Lyric Wallwork Winik, "There's a New Generation with a Different Attitude,"
Parade (July 18, 1999): 6-8. See also, The National Indian Education
Association http://www.niea.org .
10. NIEA.
11. Winik, 7.
12. Transformation 2000: A Three-Year Goal
for the RLDS Church, brochure (n.d.).
13. Kevin Gover before the 55th
Annual National Congress of American Indians, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
(October 20, 1998),
http://www.doi/gov/bia/ncakg4.htm .
14. Winik, and also "Notes of Roger McKinney"
(October 10, 1998), handout given to MNAN Task Force, passim. See also
the National Congress of American Indians, "Issues in Indian Country,"
http://nica.org .
15. We would lift up the transforming
ministry provided by the Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, congregation through their
prayerful study of Native American spirituality with their nearby neighbors, the
Sault tribe of the Ojibwe Nation, which has led to increased understandings and
the sponsorship of Alcoholics Anonymous meetings at the church. See "Spiritual
Paths to Transformation," Saints Herald 147, no. 1 (January 2000): 16.
16. The Heartbeat of Turtle Island: A
Journal of Native Service-Learning (NIYLP, Spring 1999), 28.
17. Rutherford, "Population" in "Canada."
18. As cited in Robert Bartel, "Residential
Schools," chapter 6, "Errors of the Church," in The Teachable Moment: A
Christian Response to the Native Peoples of the Americas (supplement),
produced by the Mennonite Central Committee Canada (MCCC), (1993), 77.
19. John H. Redkop, "Why Apologize to Native
People in 1992?" in The Teachable Moment: A Christian Response to the Native
Peoples of the Americas (A Ten Lesson Series), 12.
20. First Presidency Priority (1997).
21. Carol Hampton, "A Heritage Denied:
American Indians Struggle for Racial Justice," Sojourners (January 1991):
12.
22. George E. Tinker, Missionary Conquest:
The Gospel and Native American Culture Genocide (Minneapolis, Minnesota:
Fortress Press, 1993), viii-ix.
23. Black Elk, "The First Peace," excerpt
from Native Wisdom, ed. Joseph Bruchac (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco,
1995), 80.
24. Wallis, 118.
25. Donald W. Shriver Jr. "Bridging the Abyss
of Revenge," Christian Century 116, no. 33 (December 1, 1999): 1169-1173.
26. Ibid., 1170.
27. Winik, 8.
28. The original Tree of Peace (Great League)
of the Iroquois consisted of the Seneca, Cayuga, Onondaga, Oneida, and Mohawk.
They inhabited most of central New York from the Genesee River to Lake
Champlain. The Tuscarora "returned" after 1712 and were accepted into the
council of the Great League. See William Brandon, The American Heritage Book
of Indians (New York: Dell, 1961).
29. Lee Pement, "RLDS Missions to Native
Americans, 1860-1934," 74; master's thesis.
30. Ibid., 103.
31. Ibid., 59.
32. Case selected 160 acres with a large
spring on it. It was only six miles from the site of the infamous Washita River
attack, where Custer, at dawn on November 27, 1868, had raided Black Kettle's
Cheyenne winter camp. See Pement, chapter 5, 7, passim.
33. Ibid., 89.
34. Ibid., 83.
35. Shriver, 1171.
36. Ibid.
37. Ibid.
38. Ibid., 1172.
39. Ibid., 1173.
40. Notes of Roger McKinney.
41. Kendra Friend, "WoRLDService Pilot
Program Launched," Saints Herald 146, no. 9 (September 1999): 25-27.
42. Not referring to tracts or books.
43. Zion's Hope 1, no. 1 (July 1869):
3; emphasis in the original.
44. To Build a Bridge: A Manual on How to
Work Effectively with Indian Communities, A Report to the Headwaters
Foundation, American Indian Research and Policy Institute. Prepared by John
Poupart and Dr. Cecilia Martmez (October 1999), "Family and Kinship: (n.p.) and
"Native American Ministries Task Force Subcommittee (Thoughts)," prepared by
Keith Russell (October 1999), passim.
45. Ibid. Poupart and Martmez,
"Problem-finding vs. System Change."
46. Ibid. "Spirituality," passim.
47. Ibid. "Introduction."
|