D & C 163  | |
|
|
 |
|
Richard Brown is Herald editor and has served
in multiple editorial roles at International Headquarters and with
Herald Publishing House since 1986. He and his wife Sally, live in
Blue Springs, Missouri. |
|
Discernment
Activity |
Doctrine and Covenants 163
Commentary Series
The Temple Calls
by Richard A. Brown
The Temple is an instrument of ongoing revelation in the
life of the church. Its symbolism and ministries call people to reverence in
the presence of the Divine Being. Transformative encounters with the Eternal
Creator and Reconciler await those who follow its spiritual pathways of
healing, reconciliation, peace, strengthening of faith, and knowledge.
—Doctrine and Covenants 163:8a
Years ago, while the steel skeleton of the Temple was still
rising, I compared that moment with moving into a house and finding a place for
everything in the kitchen. Kitchens have more stuff than anywhere else in a
house, and, generally speaking, once you stock your kitchen with everything from
dishes to canned goods, that’s where they’ll remain. And so, I wrote, we needed
to “get the Temple right” from the start.
I was right about kitchens. I was wrong about the Temple!
Kitchens, you see, are just rooms in buildings. Temples are more
than that; they are symbols—of hopes and dreams, mission and vision, identity
and relationships. They are sacred space.
A common complaint back then was that the church was building
the Temple without knowing exactly why. Despite all that had been written by
church leaders and members, uncertainty remained. In the midst of these
questions, we proceeded, in response both to inspired counsel and, I think at
least in part, because building the Temple was a dream handed to us from
generations who had sacrificially invested their lives.
Scripture and religious history are filled with people asking
questions. Not long after miraculously leading the Hebrews out of Egypt, Moses
was confronted with complaints that he had led the people into the wilderness
just so they would starve to death. But God heard the grumbling and promised
Moses meat would be provided at sunset and bread at dawn. Sure enough, quail
flew into the encampment that evening. The next morning a fine, flaky substance
covered the ground after the dew burned off. The people had never seen such a
thing and questioned, “What is it?” (In Hebrew it was “man-hu.”) This
“manna” saved their lives and sustained them on their wilderness journey.
About three thousand years later, in July 1831, Joseph Smith Jr.
gathered a small group of followers in Independence, Missouri (on the edge of
the American wilderness) to dedicate land for a temple. They wouldn’t even own
the land for another five months. I can imagine somebody asking about that
temple: “What is it?” Other church members in Kirtland, Ohio, soon began to ask
questions about a “School of the Prophets” and what kind of structure would
house it. Plans for a simple meetinghouse eventually expanded into a much
grander “House of the Lord.” In time, people called it a temple, too. An answer
to “What is it?” came in December 1832:
Organize yourselves; prepare every needful thing, and
establish a house, even a house of prayer, a house of fasting, a house of
faith, a house of learning, a house of glory, a house of order, a house of
God; that your incomings may be in the name of the Lord; that your outgoings
may be in the name of the Lord; that all your salutations may be in the name
of the Lord, with uplifted hands unto the Most High.
—Doctrine and Covenants
85:36b–c
This spiritual foundation remains more than 175 years later for
both the Temple in Independence and the “House of the Lord” in Kirtland. They
have become sacred space for us. Twenty years ago Bob Mesle pointed out that “it
is not God who will be more present in the Temple, but people who will be more
open to that sacred presence…. Sacred space becomes more sacred, more powerful,
as our experiences with it grow in meaning and richness, making us more open to
the presence of the Divine there” (“Reflections on Sacred Space,” Herald,
September 1988).
Those early church members did not stay in Independence or
Kirtland for long. By the late 1830s, after experiencing violent persecution and
forced eviction, the Saints gathered on the Illinois side of the Mississippi
River to build their own city, Nauvoo. There they raised another temple,
although it reflected new and starkly different theological ideas. The
Reorganization later rejected both those ideas and the temple that embodied
them.
The church would do a lot of “incomings and outgoings” during
the next century. We have always been on the move, both geographically and
institutionally. Each succeeding generation passed on a dream of one day
building a temple in the “center place of Zion”—Independence, Missouri.
Meanwhile we were continually challenged by boundary issues: we’re not Mormon
(at least in the Utah sense) but definitely Latter Day Saints; we’re not
Protestants (mainline or evangelical) but certainly Christians. In fact, we
share something in common with a great many Christian groups, yet we remain a
unique Christian community.
Boundaries offer both blessings and curses. When we don’t fit
neatly in a known category, others may question if we’re really Christian. And
we constantly ask ourselves, What is it? when the topic turns to
identity. We received this prophetic insight at World Conference in 2000:
Lift up your eyes and fix them on the place beyond the
horizon to which you are sent.… Become a people of the Temple—those who see
violence but proclaim peace, who feel conflict yet extend the hand of
reconciliation, who encounter broken spirits and find pathways for healing….
Let it [the Temple] stand as a towering symbol of a people who knew
injustice and strife on the frontier and who now seek the peace of Jesus
Christ throughout the world. —Doctrine and Covenants 161:1a, 2a–b
The Temple offers a key into understanding who we are,
what we are called to do, where we are called to go, and how we
fit into God’s plan to redeem creation, culminating in the peaceable reign of
Christ. We are not alone in this divine plan, but we hold a definite place in
its unfolding.
Sociologists sometimes classify Christian groups into four major
categories (see figure 1), identified with these or similar terms:
-
Liturgicals, who value ritual, particularly to
celebrate the sacraments
-
Social Justice Christians, whose passionate faith
changes the world
-
Conservatives, who anchor their faith in foundational
beliefs
-
Renewalists, who are guided by the Holy Spirit
Forty or fifty years ago most denominations fit primarily into a
single category. Even then, though, there was some crossover. Liturgical Roman
Catholics have long displayed strong strains of social justice and spiritual
renewal. Methodists, founded by social-justice champion John Wesley, have led
the way among Protestants with liturgical creativity. In recent years the pace
of boundary-crossing has picked up, resulting in more-diverse denominations. A
major challenge, however, is handling issues raised by that very diversity.
|
Liturgicals |
Social Justice
Christians
|
|
Renewalists |
Conservatives |
Phyllis Tickle is an astute observer of the sociology of
religion. She sees a new form of Christianity emerging, one that could be for
the twenty-first century what the Great Reformation was 500 years ago. A major
characteristic is constant movement around the intersection point of the four
quadrants:
There is enormous energy in centripetal force, especially as
it gathers more and more of its own kind into itself. Centripetal force,
though, is usually envisioned by us as running downward, like the water in a
bathtub drain. The gathering force of the new Christianity did the opposite.
It ran upward and poured itself out, like some bursting geyser, in expanding
waves of influence and nourishment. Where once the corners had met, now
there was a swirling center, its centripetal force racing from quadrant to
quadrant in ever-widening circles, picking up ideas and people from each,
sweeping them into the center, mixing them there, and then spewing them
forth into a new way of being Christian, into a new way of being Church. —The
Great Emergence: How Christianity Is Changing and Why (Baker, 2008), 135
The spiral form of the Temple sanctuary has become a critical
metaphor for Community of Christ. It evokes multiple images, including these
two:
Recent prophetic counsel reinforces these themes: “Understand
that the road to transformation travels both inward and outward. The road to
transformation is the path of the disciple” (Doctrine and Covenants 161:3d). “Do not be
defined by the things that separate you but by the things that unite you in
Jesus Christ” (Doctrine and Covenants 162:5a). “Transformative encounters with the Eternal
Creator and Reconciler await those who follow its [the Temple’s] spiritual
pathways of healing, reconciliation, peace, strengthening of faith, and
knowledge” (Doctrine and Covenants 163:8a).
An Exile People
Perhaps it’s no coincidence that Community of Christ has never identified solely
with any of those four major groupings of Christians. There have been times when
we have stressed one or more areas more strongly than others. In one sense, our
spiritual journey is that of an “exile people,” whose only real home is a
kingdom yet to be realized on earth as it is in heaven. Now, as an increasingly
international church, we have even more “incomings and outgoings,” diversity,
perspectives, and interests. It should not be surprising, then, that some within
our faith community want a clearly worded statement of beliefs, while others
desire to build signal communities, and others—well, is there an end to the
options? What is it, then, that holds us together? Section 163 echoes
inspired counsel from 1984:
The temple shall be dedicated to the pursuit of peace. It
shall be for reconciliation and for healing of the spirit. It shall also be
for a strengthening of faith and preparation for witness. By its ministries
an attitude of wholeness of body, mind, and spirit as a desirable end toward
which to strive will be fostered. It shall be the means for providing
leadership education for priesthood and member. And it shall be a place in
which the essential meaning of the Restoration as healing and redeeming
agent is given new life and understanding, inspired by the life and
witness of the Redeemer of the world. —Doctrine and Covenants 156:5
That last phrase—“inspired by the life and witness of the
Redeemer of the world”—is critical. Velma Ruch put it this way: “Now is
the time—the time to learn the way to the Temple…. It can be accomplished only
by people who have experienced the redemptive power of Christ in their own lives
and who, in the response of their discipleship, seek to be true ambassadors”
(“The Way to the Temple,” Herald, September 1988).
The Temple calls us to minister as Jesus did: healing,
reconciling, making peace, strengthening faith, and increasing knowledge. Of
course, the way of Jesus Christ leads to the cross and to resurrection.
|